Writers Strike News: Hyphenates Face Tough Choices - Give Me My Remote : Give Me My Remote

Writers Strike News: Hyphenates Face Tough Choices

November 5, 2007 by  

BJ Novak, writers strike

The writers are on strike.  Many of you are increasingly interested in how this will affect your favorite shows.  I’ll try to keep gathering and passing along interesting articles that I hope you will find of interest.

This article from Variety uses a favorite show of GMMRers, THE OFFICE, to examine just how the incresing number of hyphenates (those who have multiple titles on a show) are affected.  B.J. Novak, Mindy Kaling and Paul Lieberstein are all hyphenates.  As writers they are on strike and should be on the picket line, but as they are also actors they are required to be at work.  But while at work, by conditions of the strike they are not to assist in any form of show writing including rewrites which are a normal part of shooting.

But where’s the line? Do the actors on THE OFFICE have to follow the script verbatim?  What it Steve Carell wants to rework a few lines…is that crossing the picket line?  Having written “The 40 Year-Old Virgin” as well as a few episodes of The Office (last year’s ‘Casino Night’ and this week’s ‘Survivor Man’) isn’t Steve essentially on strike too?  What about Jenna Fischer who wrote ‘Lollilove’ and John Krasinski who wrote ‘Brief Interviews with Hideous Men’.  I can’t say for sure if they are part of the WGA but the might be.

While sad and disappointing, I find the strike and the ramifications of it quite fascinating. Read this article from Variety for more on the subject.

Office’ co-stars caught in strike zone
Writers, other hyphenates face tough choices

Once a WGA walkout begins, B.J. Novak — a writer and a star of NBC’s hit comedy “The Office” — will face a very tough choice.

As a card-carrying member of the Writers Guild, he’ll clearly be on strike. But he’s also a thesp and a member of the Screen Actors Guild. NBC’s studio arm has made it clear that it expects Novak the actor to show up to work today, strike or no strike.

Because it has several scribes who also serve as thesps (also including Mindy Kaling and Paul Lieberstein), “The Office” is one of the most visible examples of shows where conflicting interests will be at work once a strike begins. But all over town, a number of WGA members will be facing similarly tough calls.

The vast majority of TV shows are run by producers who double as scribes. The networks are counting on these writer-producers — aka showrunners — to keep things humming on set as work continues on scripts already in the can.

But the WGA has been urging its showrunners to stand down. It held a meeting Saturday at the Sheraton Universal designed to persuade showrunners to stop working immediately. The argument is that the more episodes the nets have in the can, the longer a strike will go.

“The official line on all of our shows is we expect you to show up,” said one senior network executive. “We’ve told them that it’s required under their contracts, and they’ll be in breach if they don’t show up.”

“Showrunners will not show on Monday or all week,” predicted one top exec producer-showrunner. “No one likes to leave a crew unsure of whether or not they have work, or assistants wondering where their next paycheck will come from. And no one wants to leave their baby in someone else’s hands. It’s a difficult time. But I will not cross a picket line.”

Studio and network execs aren’t sure what to expect today.

One studio chief said he doesn’t think the showrunners for his half-hour comedies will be at work today. Indeed, it’s widely expected that all multicamera laffers — including “Back to You,” “Two and a Half Men,” ” ‘Til Death,” “The Big Bang Theory” and “The New Adventures of Old Christine” — will shutter production the moment writers strike, since sitcoms require all sorts of rewrites during the course of a production week.

And unlike single-camera shows, in which writers are too busy in the room to drive over to a set and watch an all-day filming, scribes are generally right onstage during a live taping — and frequently huddle between takes in order to come up with snappier dialogue.

By contrast, the same studio topper said he thinks some of his drama showrunners will keep working to finish production on segs already scripted.

“It’s a fascinating position these showrunners are put into,” another studio exec said. “From a pure economics standpoint, if they can provide extra scripts, that’s extra fees for a lot of people who need the money. On the other hand, the more episodes we have, supposedly the less pressure there will be on us. But I would think if I were a writer, I’d get as many scripts into shooting position as possible.”

One drama showrunner conceded that most producers were in a bind, especially those trying to launch new skeins.

“It’s incredibly painful to have episodes being shot that you can not supervise, scripts that will need adjustment that you can’t help and cuts being edited and you’re not in the room shaping,” the producer said. “I’m also worried about what a loss of momentum could do to new shows finding their legs and their audiences. That said, this is bigger than us and may shape the industry for generations to come.”

So what happens if these actors and showrunners decide not to work?

“Whether we’ll pursue legal action will be determined on a case-by-case basis,” one network suit said.

But realistically, it seems hard to believe NBC U would go after “The Office’s” hyphenates or that Warner Bros. would sue Chuck Lorre if they opt not to render acting or producing services once a strike begins.

That’s because Hollywood remains a town built on talent relations. As bitter as things could get with a strike, nobody wants to risk alienating key talent further by insisting they cross picket lines.

That said, nets and studios are also prepared to defend those scribes or actors who incur the wrath of the unions if they do show up for work. If “The Office’s” Novak, for example, gets fined by the WGA, one NBC insider said the company won’t hesitate to fight the fines on behalf of the scribe.


9 Responses to “Writers Strike News: Hyphenates Face Tough Choices”

  1. Writers Strike News: Hyphenates Face Tough Choices — All This Nonsense on November 5th, 2007 11:16 am

    […] reading this post by: Give Me My Remote For more… RSS […]

  2. Billiam on November 5th, 2007 12:15 pm

    Whatever you argue about principles and getting what you deserve (and certainly writers deserve more credit), a strike is essentially about wanting more money. If I was a showrunner, and I thought of the show as my baby, I would care more about making sure the written-but-not-taped episodes get made well (involving some rewrites and such), then I would about money. And some of those shows will most likely get cancelled when they run out of scripts. Do you let your show (which you’ve invested so much into) die for the sake of the strike?

  3. HealthcareHottie on November 5th, 2007 12:40 pm

    It seems like some of them don’t have a choice. Like it said in the article:

    “It’s incredibly painful to have episodes being shot that you can not supervise, scripts that will need adjustment that you can’t help and cuts being edited and you’re not in the room shaping,” the producer said. “I’m also worried about what a loss of momentum could do to new shows finding their legs and their audiences. That said, this is bigger than us and may shape the industry for generations to come.”

    I’m sure people like BJ Novak and Tina Fey would like this all to go away so they can get back to work.

  4. Kelly on November 5th, 2007 1:50 pm

    It is definitely not about principals it is entirely about getting paid. Do you work for principles at your job or for money? They want to be fairly compensated for the work they do and that is not an absurd request. Without the writers the studios wouldn’t be making billions of dollars a year so why not give them a fair piece of the pie? I grew up union and going on strike is always the last option but you walk the line and wait for a fair deal. If the studios cared even a little about the quality of their shows then they would have come to a fair deal months ago.

  5. Kristi on November 5th, 2007 1:56 pm

    Ugh, this is all really sad.. I hope it can be solved before it goes on too long and changes things forever.

    So, what does this mean for Late Night TV? Is it going into reruns tonight? Matt Nathanson is supposed to be on Jimmy Kimmel tonight… does that not happen now?

  6. lkg on November 5th, 2007 3:44 pm

    James Gunn’s myspace blog mentioned that Steve Carrell did not show up to work today. I’m not sure about Mindy, Paul or B.J.

  7. Paige on November 5th, 2007 4:47 pm

    I just read James Gunn’s blog too! I really hope this doesn’t last long… how will I live?!

  8. Billiam on November 5th, 2007 5:15 pm

    I’m actually wasn’t posting about the writers: they have no choice, since they’re in the union. I was talking about the “showrunners,” who apparently do have a choice.

  9. CFO (not my initials) on November 6th, 2007 5:08 pm

    I am totally on the side of the writers. If my shows get messed up or don’t come back, I will blame the studios. The writers are so much of what makes any entertainment great.
    I just hope they can find an agreement soon so that we can get back to good programming. If reality TV takes over, my TV will just be off!
    I got through all last season of “The Office” by reminding myself to “trust the writers” (and it paid off well). Without solid scribes, there is no great TV.